The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
I really like some of the terminology that Cisco uses in their error messages. And since I come across those quite often in my studies I am becoming familiar with lots of them. I discovered one of my favorites today while attempting to remove the ip nat pool TEST…. statement.
%Pool TEST in use, cannot destroy
Cannot destroy…Nice!
So the lesson learned here is to remove the ip nat inside source list 1 pool TEST statement then remove the NAT pool!
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Cisco announced today a new credential available to network professionals. The Cisco Certified Architect is designed to meet the demands of today’s business markets and marries the implementation and design aspects of the Architect level job role.
Key Facts/Highlights:
* Advanced technologies such as Cisco Unified Communications,
Cisco TelePresenceTM and mobility are converging and
increasing the opportunities for innovation and
collaboration while adding to the complexity of enterprise
networks.
* According to IDC, "With many existing certifications
focused on point technologies, architect-level
certifications bring together project management, business
needs analysis, and IT elements into a true solutions
framework and validate a candidate's ability to address
planning, design, interoperability, and connectivity
issues."
* Gartner reported in its 2008 IT market compensation
study (U.S. based), that "IT organizations continue to
have difficulty in finding skilled IT professionals,
especially enterprise architects, network architects,
project managers and Web application programmers." **
Cisco Certified Architect:
* The Cisco Certified Architect certification recognizes
the architectural experience and competency of
network designers who can support the increasingly
complex networks of global organizations and effectively
translate business strategies into evolutionary technical
strategies.
* Cisco channel partners play a critical role in enabling
customers to deploy advanced new technologies supported by
professionals with the skills required to use these
innovative solutions.
* The certification stands above the expert-level CCIE®
certification in terms of difficulty, with an emphasis on
expertise in network infrastructure architecture and a
proven ability to work with executive-level customers to
ensure that business requirements are incorporated into
successful designs.
Certification Process:
* The Cisco Certified Architect certification will be
administered as a board exam.
* Candidates will propose and defend an architecture
solution to a set of business requirements, and the
candidates will be asked to modify their proposals "on
the fly," based on additional requirements presented by
the board.
* Prerequisites include a CCDETM certification, approximately
10 years of industry experience, and acceptance into
the program via an application process.
From the perspective of a technologist who recently acquired the CCIE credential, I breathe a mild sigh of frustration. But then, I take a moment and recenter myself in the world that actually exists and realize that the market is in great flux today. Stakeholders, business market groups and technologists alike are looking for that all or none solution when it comes to talent. Talent is hard to come buy by, and the CCA will be well worth their weight.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Bill Gates is continuing to prove himself a formidable philanthropist as well a visionary by creating DreamSpark. DreamSpark, from what I can tell, is a program geared at creating Microsoft developers from a young age. Along with the Alice project, DreamSpark allows young developers to learn the tools of the trade at no cost while also allowing the university or high school student the opportunity to attain real world credentialing with a free MCTS test voucher.
Check out the program at http://www.dreamspark.com.
Filed under: Off Topic, Uncategorized | Tagged: Development, Microsoft | Leave a Comment »
Received the following email today from Cisco Learning:
Cisco has revised the certification requirements for CCIE Routing & Switching (CCIE R&S)-the expert level certification for network engineers.
The new certification standards reflect the job skills employers look for at the expert level and are outlined on the Cisco Learning Network at CCIE R&S v4.0 written exam topics and CCIE R&S v4.0 lab exam topics. The revised CCIE R&S v4.0 exams are scheduled for release on October 18, 2009 and will immediately replace the currently available v3.0 exams.
To support the certification changes, the Cisco 360 Learning Program for CCIE R&S is being updated with new lessons on MPLS and Troubleshooting, additions to the instructor-led workshops, new lab exercises for self-paced practice, and new performance assessments. The Program is the only authorized expert training currently aligned to CCIE R&S v4.0. The program is delivered globally by Cisco Learning Partners .
Filed under: Off Topic, Technology - General | Leave a Comment »
After more attempts than I would like to admit, I finally passed the CCIE R&S Lab. I took it on April 24th, and found out the news today. Huge sigh of relief. I will post more with regards to the experience later, but the important part is #24221.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
VRF-Lite is a simple solution for segregating traffic from different networks across the backbone. It creates individual routing tables for each VRF we create, keeping them out of the global routing table. Virtualization in this manner is very handy in large networks where we may want to separate traffic from our sales and logistics organizations. We may also want to turn up a guest VRF to allow visitors access to the internet without mingling through our enterprise routing table!
The following is a tutorial on a simple VRF-Lite configuration using OSPF. To begin with, you can download the the topology we will be working with from here:
http://rapidshare.com/files/193141474/VRF-Lite.zip
Our network consists of four routers, SG1 – SG4, all running OSPF 1. Since we are only using a single physical interface between each device, we till set up the trunks and configure layer 3 connectivity via SVI’s. Here are a few extra notes on the topology and device configurations. These will help us turn up SG5 and SG6 and verify connectivity across the backbone.
On SG1 set the vtp mode to transparent and create the VLANs:
>enable
#vlan database
(vlan)#vtp transparent
(vlan)#vlan 12
(vlan)#vlan 13
(vlan)#vlan 51
(vlan)#vlan 112
(vlan)#vlan 113
(vlan)#exit
Set trunking on physical interface:
#configure terminal
(config)#interface FastEthernet 0/2
(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
(config-if)#exit
(config)#interface FastEthernet 0/3
(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
(config-if)#exit
(config)#end
#copy running-config startup-config (or write memory)
Create the loopback addresses
#configure terminal
(config)#interface loopback0
(config-if)#ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.255
(config-if)#exit
(config)#interface loopback2
(config-if)#ip address 11.11.11.11 255.255.255.255
(config-if)#exit
(config)#end
#copy running-config startup-config (or write memory)
Configure OSPF
#configure terminal
(config)#router ospf 1
(config-router)#router-id 1.1.1.1
(config-router)#network 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 area 0
(config-router)#network 10.1.0.0 0.0.63.255 area 0
(config-if)#exit
(config)#end
#copy running-config startup-config (or write memory)
Perform the same steps on the other four routers using the information from the drawing. Note that OSPF process 1 is in yellow and the VLANs are not the same. Once you have that set up, verify your connectivity from SG1 – SG4 by pinging the loopbacks and looking at the routing tables.
SG1#sh ip route
Codes: C – connected, S – static, R – RIP, M – mobile, B – BGP
D – EIGRP, EX – EIGRP external, O – OSPF, IA – OSPF inter area
N1 – OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 – OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 – OSPF external type 1, E2 – OSPF external type 2
i – IS-IS, su – IS-IS summary, L1 – IS-IS level-1, L2 – IS-IS level-2
ia – IS-IS inter area, * – candidate default, U – per-user static route
o – ODR, P – periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
1.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 1.1.1.1 is directly connected, Loopback0
2.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 2.2.2.2 [110/2] via 10.1.12.2, 00:00:09, Vlan12
3.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 3.3.3.3 [110/2] via 10.1.13.2, 00:00:09, Vlan13
4.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 4.4.4.4 [110/3] via 10.1.13.2, 00:00:09, Vlan13
10.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 4 subnets
C 10.1.13.0 is directly connected, Vlan13
C 10.1.12.0 is directly connected, Vlan12
O 10.1.24.0 [110/2] via 10.1.12.2, 00:00:09, Vlan12
O 10.1.34.0 [110/2] via 10.1.13.2, 00:00:09, Vlan13
SG1#ping 4.4.4.4
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 4.4.4.4, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 76/96/120 ms
Now that we have our enterprise network (albeit small with only 4 routers) let’s build a VRF that will separate the traffic from SG5 and SG6 from the global routing table. The first thing we need to do is build the VRF. The VRF name can be any alphanumeric value but it needs a unique route distinguisher which has two values separated by a colon, value1:value2. The values are arbitrary and must be numerical; you can assign an IP address to value 1 if desired. Since we are not using BGP, redistribution, or MPLS tagging, (hence VRF-Lite!) this VRF must be built on all interconnecting routers where you want the traffic to travel.
#configure terminal
(config)#ip vrf Guest
(config-vrf)#rd 2:100
(config-vrf)# route-target export 2:100
(config-vrf)# route-target import 2:100
(config-vrf)#exit
(config)#exit
Now we need to identify the interfaces that are going to participate in the VRF. In order to add them to the VRF and separate them from participating in the global routing table, we need to apply the ip vrf forwarding <vrf-name> command to the interface. On SG1, it looks like this:
NOTE: Adding the ip vrf forwarding <vrf-name> command to the interface will automatically remove any IP address assigned to the interface. In that case we will have to reassign the IP address.
#configure terminal
(config)#interface FastEthernet 0/0
(config-if)#ip vrf forwarding Guest
(config-if)#ip address 10.2.51.1 255.255.255.252
(config-if)#exit
(config)#exit
Using the topology drawing, add the remaining interfaces to the VRF on all routers.
Now we will create the routing process for our VRF using OSPF. The configurations are identical to our global OSPF process with one exception. In order to designate the OSPF process for the VRF we need to add the VRF name: router ospf 2 vrf Guest. Here is the configuration on SG1:
#configure terminal
(config)#router ospf 2 vrf Guest
(config-router)#router-id 11.11.11.11
(config-router)#network 10.2.0.0 0.0.127.255 area 0
(config-router)#network 11.11.11.11 0.0.0.0 area 0
(config-router)#exit
(config)#exit
Again, apply this configuration to SG2, SG3, and SG4 using the corresponding address assignments. In order to view the VRF routing table and ping across or virtualized private network, we again add the VRF name at the end of the statement:
#show ip route vrf Guest
#ping vrf Guest 44.44.44.44
Verify your connectivity from SG1 – SG4 by pinging the loopbacks and looking at the routing tables.
SG1#show ip route vrf Guest
Routing Table: Guest
Codes: C – connected, S – static, R – RIP, M – mobile, B – BGP
D – EIGRP, EX – EIGRP external, O – OSPF, IA – OSPF inter area
N1 – OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 – OSPF NSSA external type 2
E1 – OSPF external type 1, E2 – OSPF external type 2
i – IS-IS, su – IS-IS summary, L1 – IS-IS level-1, L2 – IS-IS level-2
ia – IS-IS inter area, * – candidate default, U – per-user static route
o – ODR, P – periodic downloaded static route
Gateway of last resort is not set
33.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 33.33.33.33 [110/2] via 10.2.113.2, 00:37:33, Vlan113
22.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 22.22.22.22 [110/2] via 10.2.112.2, 00:37:33, Vlan112
10.0.0.0/30 is subnetted, 5 subnets
O 10.2.46.0 [110/3] via 10.2.112.2, 00:37:33, Vlan112
C 10.2.51.0 is directly connected, Vlan51
O 10.2.124.0 [110/2] via 10.2.112.2, 00:37:33, Vlan112
C 10.2.112.0 is directly connected, Vlan112
C 10.2.113.0 is directly connected, Vlan113
11.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 11.11.11.11 is directly connected, Loopback2
44.0.0.0/32 is subnetted, 1 subnets
O 44.44.44.44 [110/3] via 10.2.112.2, 00:37:33, Vlan112
SG1#ping vrf Guest 44.44.44.44
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 44.44.44.44, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 80/132/228 ms
Viola! We know transport is good across our backbone.
Once we have applied these configurations we should have connectivity between SG5 and SG6.
SG5#ping 10.2.46.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.2.46.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 220/284/404 ms
SG6#ping 10.2.51.2
Type escape sequence to abort.
Sending 5, 100-byte ICMP Echos to 10.2.51.2, timeout is 2 seconds:
!!!!!
Success rate is 100 percent (5/5), round-trip min/avg/max = 220/250/288 ms
Please post comments or questions. Have fun!
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »
1) Created a task list but did not stick with it
2) Started to late and did not have my own drawing
3) Trunking
4) VLAN Assignments and VTP
5) Did not configure STP
6) PVLANs
7) No Frame Relay issues
OSPF
9) EIGRP
10) RIPv2
11) Redistribution
12) BGP
13) IP Multicast
14) No IPv6 problems
15) QoS
16) Skipped Security section and did not have enough time to go back to it. Need to review all security topics
17) System management
18) IP Services
Overall, nowhere near where I want to be. This lab is rated as the easiest in the workbook and I clearly failed it. So, a lot of work to do and not a whole lot of time to do it.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »
Filed under: Bridging, Catalyst Security, Ethernet, Implementation, Operations, Technology - General | 1 Comment »
Ethernet Error Analysis
When characterizing the health of an Ethernet segment the kind of errors captured and their quantity will differ as to how they will effect the segments ability to service upper-layer protocol forwarding. There are six primary error types that can be received on an Ethernet interface:
Local Collisions
This type of collision is recognized as a frame smaller than the 64 byte minimum frame size. This frame will also have a CRC error. For Ethernet, this value should be no greater than 2% on contention media. Collision occurrence begins to inhibit the upper layers ability to communicate properly at 3% – 5%.
The remote collision has the exact same characteristics, except that it occurred on another segment. The collision occurs on a remote segment and the repeating devices propagates it to the local segment.
Late Collisions
This type of collision is an indicator of excess media length. It is recognized as a frame larger than the 64 byte minimum frame length and is received with a CRC error. Devices prone to this type of error are at opposing ends of the segment and they do not detect that a collision occurred as the media length is longer than the recommended media maximum.
Cyclic Redundancy Checks and Alignment Errors
This type of error indicates that the frame checksum detected an accidental alteration of data during transmission. If the frame is received at a normal length and the media is within recommended specifications and a CRC error is received, it can be assumed that the transmitting device is having problems when the error rate is greater than 3 or 4%.
Long/Short Frame
Short < 64 Bytes & Long > 1518 Bytes. Short frames can indicate local collisions and long frames can indicates late collisions. Both could also indicate adapter issues on the segment. Ethernet NICs are built to a standard that rely on the frame size being within a range of sizes. If the frame comes in outside of the standard length, it will not be processed properly.
Jabber
This is an instance where a NIC is operating improperly and is utilizing the line 100% of the time. This is caused by the NIC sensing a collision, transmitting a jam signal to clear the line and mistaking the jam signal for another collision and then repeating the cycle of events. This can consume all segment resources.
Filed under: Uncategorized | Leave a Comment »